The presidential debate was a shocker.
Shocker
# 1: Romney made some claims that were so totally off of his whole
platform, so different than whats he's been saying, that you have to
wonder if he thinks he'll get away with it.
Shocker #
2: Was Obama off his game or did he plan on being that timid? This was
probably the worst public showing since the man got elected. Maybe he
was ill? Nope. The very next day, Obama was making a whole lot of
sense; and no question of his oratory skill.
Politico: How President Obama's Debate Strategy Bombed.
Shocker
# 3: Belief weighs more than truth. The best religious adherents will
cling to and keep espousing a belief even if it has been just
doubtlessly and methodically disproven. This is precisely how Mitt
Romney won the debate. Obama would have had to be just as persistent
about exposing Romney as Romney was to clinging to his bag of lies.
I almost
want to say, who cares about the debate? But I think it makes me sound
like a sore ole liberal that just wanted Obama to win. Romney "mangled the truth" in the debate, as Dan Rather
put it. Obama had flubs as well. This, too, is important.
Politifact's fact-checking of the debate.
No comments:
Post a Comment